Skip to main content
Back to directory

Claude profile

An AI assistant for writing, analysis and other tasks.

A polished draft can become an interactive tool without leaving the conversation.

Editorial Trust score: 60/100

Assessed 18 October 2026

What they say vs what they do

15/25 points

Claude’s careful conversational style is part of its product appeal. Its September 2026 consumer policy describes improvement uses of inputs and outputs, with an opt-out choice.

Sources (4)

What they know—and what they do with it

15/25 points

Anthropic describes account, conversation, technical and third-party training data. Consumer inputs/outputs may be used for model improvement unless opted out; feedback and materials flagged for safety/security/policy review have stated exceptions. Business/API customer content is governed separately.

Sources (4)

Quality vs Quantity

10/25 points

A measured tone can make a draft easy to trust. The reasoning, calculations and original source material provide a firmer basis for judging it.

Sources (6)

How much control you really have

20/25 points

Review consumer training choices, project access and connector permissions separately; business settings follow their own arrangements.

Sources (6)

Who does it better

Comparison priority: writing, analysis, interactive artifacts and connected work. The assistant fits best when its tools match the actual deliverable.

Sources (3)

Tools to keep more to yourself: privacy tools and account protection in The Escape Hatch.